OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

CHENNAI  II COMMISSIONERATE, NANDANAM, CHENNAI 600 035

 

 

 

TRADE NOTICE No. 72/2001                                                                                                         Dated : 07.11.2001

 

 

                  Sub. : C.Ex.- Recovery of  'amounts' which are not duty paid under the provisions

                                   of  rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001(Rule 57CC of the erstwhile

                                   Central Excise Rules, 1944) clarification - Reg.

<><><>

 

 

A copy of Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Circular No. 591/28/2001-CX dt. 16.10.2001 issued in F.No. 267/58/2001 CX.8 is communicated herewith for information and necessary action.

 

The contents of this Trade Notice may please be brought to the notice of all the constituent members of your association in general and manufacturers in particular.

 

(Issued from file C.No. IV/16/145/2001 - Tech)

 

 

 

                                                                                   (G.V. KRISHNA RAO)

                                                                                      JOINT COMMISSIONER (TECH)

 

COPY OF THE BOARD'S CIRCULAR NO. 591/28/2001-CX (F.NO.267/58/2001-CX.8 DATED 16^TH OCTOBER, 2001

I am directed to say that a doubt has been raised regarding legal provisions for recovery of amount not paid by an assessee in terms of the provisions of rul 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001 (Rule 57CC of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944).

The matter has been exmined in the Board. It is stated that the basic principle underlying the CENVAT scheme is that credit is admissible if duty is paid on final products. Attention is drwn to sub-rule (1) of Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, which clearly provides that CENVAT Credit shall not be allowed on such quantity of inputs which is used in the manufacture of exempted goods, except in circumstances specified in sub-rule (2). The provisions of sub-rule (2) and (3) of rule 6 provide as to how to deal with and account for the inputs and credit of duty in cases where the inputs are used in manufacture of both dutiable as well as exempt products. It follows from the provisions that if the manufacturer does not fulfill the requirements of either sub-rule (2)[i.e. maintaining separate accounts] or sub-rule (3)[i.e. paying 8% of total price of exempted goods, other than exceptions specified in clause (a)] then in terms of sub-rule (1) the assessee shall not be allowed credit on such quantity which is used in the manufacture of exempted goods. Consequently, where the assessee has not paid the amount, the availment of corresponding credit on inputs is incorrect. The recovery od such credit taken incorrectly is squarly covered by the provisions of Rule 12 (erstwhile rule 57I). Necessary action may be taken accordingly.

                                                                                Yours faithfully,

                                                                                  Sd/-

                                                                             (Vivek Prasad)

Under Secretary to the Government of India