|
TRADE NOTICE NO. 56
/2001 |
Dated: |
03.07.2001 |
Sub: Central Excise -
Excisability of products of
heading No. 30.03 - Labeling or
re-labeling
of containers - Reg.
*****
A doubt has been raised as to whether in respect of goods covered under
heading 30.03, labeling or re-labeling of containers in order to comply with the
provisions of any State or Central Act shall amount to manufacture as per note 5
of Ch. 30 of Central Excise Tariff Act.
In this context Board vide its letter F.No. 102/4/95 - CX.3 dated
14.05.96 issued instructions to the effect that the process of pasting of
stickers in the case of excisablity of imported finished medicines including
life saving drugs marketed by the assessees may not be covered by note 5 of
Chapter 30 of the CETA,1985. However recently Board's attention was drawn to an instance
where a Company in Bombay imported medicines namely, 'actilyse'and 'magnevists'
from their principals in Germany and marketed the said product in India.
The Company carries out the process of stamping/affixing of stickers on
the imported medicine as per the requirement of the Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940
and cleared the goods without payment of duty.
The stickers indicated the import license number, name of the Company,
marketed by, product ingredients, warning and maximum retail price as required
by the Drugs and Cosmetic Act,1940. Also
attention of the Board was drawn to the Audit objection raised to the effect
that the process carried out by the company amounts to manufacture in terms of
Chapter note 5 of Chapter 30 and that duty at the appropriate rate is payable.
The
matter has been re-examined by the Board in the light of the audit objection, in
consultation with Ministry of law. Now
it is clarified that putting
certain stickers on imported product, containing information for the benefit of
the consumers, even if it is required by another law, is putting a label on the
containers/outer packing to make the product marketable and in view of note 5
Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 such an activity will,
therefore, amount to 'manufacture'. Board
instructions issued earlier in F. No. 102/4/95 - CX.3 dated 14.05.96 stands
withdrawn.
(Issued from file C.No. IV/16/2/2001 CX.Pol. Vol I)
(Authority: F.No.102/1/2000
CX.3 dated 16.05.2001)
/sd/
JANAKI ARUNKUMAR
ADDL.
COMMISSIONER (TECH..)
/sd/-
(N.UMA SHANTHI)
SUPERINTENDENT (TECH.)
To
As per Mailing
list(Both Trade and Department)